Invention versus Innovation
From a body of work I currently have in development:
Continuous innovation requires that innovation is placed at the center of the organization and that all parts of the organization are changed to support it. To effectively place innovation at the center of the organization, people must know what innovation is, what it looks like in their organization, and how they can contribute. Most people easily confuse invention with innovation, and wrongly chase invention in the name of innovation. Let’s look at the two side by side to clear up the confusion from a common source, the American Heritage Dictionary:
Invention – A discovery, a finding
Innovation – The act of introducing something new
In short, invention is coming up with a great idea, but innovation is the act of introducing that invention successfully to the world. Innovation is truly about transforming the useful seed of an invention into something valuable.
For more on this distinction between useful and valuable, stay tuned!
In the meantime, check out an example to ponder posted previously on the blog:
https://www.disruptorleague.com/blog/2007/07/11/invention-versus-innovation-auto-industry-example/
Don’t miss an article (3,950+) – Subscribe to our RSS feed and join our Innovation Excellence group!
Braden Kelley is a Social Business Architect and the author of Stoking Your Innovation Bonfire from John Wiley & Sons. Braden is also a popular innovation speaker and trainer, and advises companies on embedding innovation across the organization and how to attract and engage customers, partners, and employees.
NEVER MISS ANOTHER NEWSLETTER!
LATEST BLOGS
iPhone Followup – Innovation in a Box
My initial iPhone article highlighted why the iPhone will not be a success in its first incarnation. Make no mistake though, the introduction of the iPhone will revolutionize the mobile telephony market. Let’s answer some of the criticisms of the most innovative mobile handset in the history of mobile telephony:
Read MoreThe Growing Housing Divide
I was speaking with a friend of mine recently and he brought up an interesting point. He asserted that there was a widening gap in home prices between where people want to live and where people have to live. How else can you explain the housing price fall in most of the country while places like Seattle continue to have rising prices?
Read More